Definition: Def. 10.01: Magnitudes Commensurable and Incommensurable in Length

Those magnitudes measured by the same measure are said (to be) commensurable (in length), but (those) of which no (magnitude) admits to be a common measure (are said to be) incommensurable (in length).

Modern Formulation

Two segments of lengths \(\alpha > 0\) and \(\beta > 0\) are called commensurable (in length), if there exists a segment of length \(\gamma\) being an aliquot part of both, \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\), i.e. such that \[\alpha=p\gamma,\quad\beta=q\gamma\] for some natural numbers \(p > 0\) and \(q > 0\).

Equivalently, the segments are commensurable, if their ratio is a rational number, formally, \[\frac{\alpha}\beta=\frac{p\gamma}{q\gamma}=\frac pq.\]

If \(\alpha,\beta\) are not commensurable, we call them incommensurable (in length).

Corollaries: 1 2
Definitions: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Parts: 16
Proofs: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Propositions: 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182


Thank you to the contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0!

Github:
bookofproofs
non-Github:
@Fitzpatrick


References

Adapted from (subject to copyright, with kind permission)

  1. Fitzpatrick, Richard: Euclid's "Elements of Geometry"